Slipped overhand, TIB, adjustable, end of line or inline?
At first, i shall describe an "in the end" tying method, which is exactly the way i tied it in the first place, considering that i had to deal with an end termination loop.
Pick one of the previously mentioned , overhand configurations. It really doesn't matter which, as long as the SPart, is always designated to be the nipping turn continuation segment.
Simply feed the WE, up through the crossing knot collar and down through the nipping turn. Loading the SPart, the adjustable eye leg is blocked, and there you have the adjustability feature, along with the tibness as an extra quality.
After a quick test and a discussion with Xarax, i realised that this is actually a midline form, of a couple of TIB nooses(flip a couple of collars to reveal them), and my first approach was rather a "tugboat" loading option, of a an inline eyeknot, in the end of the rope.
I recall that Enhaut, was the first to introduce the inline noose concept, which i had not then fully understood, but now i'm starting to appreciate his viewpoint.
Third image illustrates an "adjust and load" eye loading scenario of this eyeknot, tied in the middle of the rope.
Giving it some strain, no slippage of the adjustable part came to my attention, but it needs more thorough testing to confirm its stability (always test many times before use).
It also comes with a very easy TIB tying method and unties with just one pull.