@ Siriuso
It has been said that your CSLK is a Carrick product. I've tried to match your eyeknot, with all Carrick initial dressing states, #1439,#1428 included, but paradoxically, it didn't work.
So, what's going on here? There must be some other initial dressing states, as numbers don't fit
.
Verily, try to load the first image configuration, from the on going eye leg and tail sides as white arrows indicate, and you will get your knot (first image).
If you load it from the other two lines, it will transform to a more appropriate final energy state to process the load, while yours, is better for cross loading (ring loading).
A question that raises here, is which is this asymmetrical Carrick variation, (neither symmetrical nor Carrick perhaps) that mimics original Carrick's self dressing ability?
I illustrate a slightly different #1428 variation to coordinate with your eyeknot (second image), while that trick, extends to the other classic Carricks as well.
Is there a reference in Asley's, or anywhere else, or in your bend archives? Well, if not, there will be, because having tied a loopknot, by definition you have tied the corresponding bends too
.
I assume that it is weaker than the symmetrical carrick variations, but one must struggle to discriminate between final energy states, if you ask me.
To avoid drifting off- topic, maybe you should start a new thread to explore Carrick variations?