I have already told you that in my previous reply, when i described the flip\twisted bight structure, providing a method for the transition from the anti-bowline (aka eskimo), to the kalmyk.
More details in the following link, always in good faith!!!
https://igkt.net/sm/index.php?PHPSESSID=9e964e130a215416afe399baf6af2977&topic=5324.msg35343&fbclid=IwAR1feZHtB7mn0koXlfcydl3JofqF9ZL5gb0pbLyh8V4jXHvgmC3oR0zTF08#msg35343
The anti-Bowline in its slipped form (aka 'Kalmyk') - and indeed an anti-Bowline with the bight component rotated/twisted - does not have a fully formed #206 Crossing hitch.
I regard it as a partially formed #206 Crossing hitch.
If you look at the attached image in this post - you can see a virtual Bowline built from a fully formed #206 Crossing hitch (a derivative of the so-called Karash double loop).
...
The heart of the issue is how you wish to define a #206 Crossing hitch.For example, is mere
appearance sufficient to declare it as such?
Or, must there be other qualifiers to clearly define what a #206 Crossing hitch is?
In my mind, #206 Crossing hitch (known to climbers as a Munter hitch) works on account of a capstan effect along with friction caused by rope-to-rope contact.
In a fully formed Crossing hitch, a rope segment performs a U turn around its own SPart - and exerts a degree of pressure on the SPart.
In the Karash single loop (derived from the Karash double loop) - we can see a fully formed #206 Crossing hitch.
In the Anti-Bowline, there are various dressing states and tail alignments that can be achieved - and depending on the particular dressing state - you can achieve a partial #206 Crossing hitch.
I don't think anyone has attempted to define the #206 Crossing hitch structure with precision.
It is an open argument.I think arguments for the boundary transition point where a
loop becomes a
Crossing hitch will be difficult to define - because it may not be constrained solely to a 180 degree U turn around its own SPart. Looking to Ashley may not be helpful either, because he never precisely defined a loop let alone a Crossing hitch (for example, Ashley did not appear to have a concept of loop chirality).
EDIT: I've added some more images