Author Topic: Re: My Working Notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  (Read 29547 times)

siriuso

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 256
Re: My Working Notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
« Reply #135 on: June 18, 2021, 05:10:10 AM »
Hi Mark,

Thanks for your comment. #29 is not right because the crossing layer is missing. I have got it with the crossing detail, it is being amended.

We know #1053 have the forms of S/Z and Z/S geometry and inversion, my chart should include, as well as other bends.

I am not understand what you are pointing at in your last paragraph. Please show it clear with aids of diagrams. If you are referring to the "Loops Formations Chart of Bends", the graphic presentations of the SParts and WEnds are so arranged to show the forms only.

Happy Knotting
yChan

siriuso

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 256
Re: My Working Notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
« Reply #136 on: July 19, 2021, 04:08:22 PM »
Hi dear all,

I have just updated my folders, enjoy and share.

"My New Bends" :
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/118JW083wRZ52FlhlAjF-lUvAdCpiE9fB?usp=sharing

"My Other Tying Methods of Some Known Knots" :
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1C8vtR72jJp9NjHiOR_qA9336We11Jt4g?usp=sharing

Happy Knotting
yChan

agent_smith

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1343
Re: My Working Notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
« Reply #137 on: July 22, 2021, 01:03:43 AM »
Hello yChan,

Thank you for your work.

I appear to be the only person willing to make any comment on your body of work.
To be honest, I find it difficult and tedious to examine your work - there is no page numbering, and no user friendly table of contents or indexing to make it easy for a person to try to understand and/or follow your content.

Anyhow, a very brief bit of feedback - in relation to your so-called 'reversed Zeppelin bend' and 'reversed Riggers bend':

I am unclear if you are making a claim of originality for these structures? There is no way to definitively determine what your intent is (because the way you organize your content causes everything to be 'lost in translation' and "can't see the forest for the trees" effect). Link: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/whats-meaning-cant-see-forest-through-trees-jared-jerotz

Anybody who has tied a Zeppelin bend or Riggers bend (#1425A) has - by definition - has already tied your presentations.
One only has to pull on the 'tails' to get the same transposition effect.
All you have done is transposed the tails with the SParts (in both S/S and Z/Z chirality for the Riggers bend and S/Z and Z/S for the Zeppelin bend).

The transposed Zeppelin bend - when loaded as such - now jams (because there is no longer a toggle axis).
Transposing the tails with the SParts essentially defeats the mechanism which makes a Zeppelin bend jam proof.

I also see no clear benefit with a transposed Riggers bend (#1425A).