I am regretful and apologize to those readers who have found difficulties in reading my notes,
?
Not necessary to 'apologize '!
Thought experiment: if you make a movie - you should expect that film critics will provide feedback (and not all of it will be favorable).
If you are publishing to the world - you have to expect feedback - and not all of the feedback will be favorable (obviously).
The same goes for scientific technical papers - other scientists will refute or accept the results - that's how science progresses.
It seems that you have difficulty accepting criticism?
That's something that you need to work on yChan.
I am declaring that I think your photos should not taken against a convoluted background (eg a couch/sofa).
Convoluted backgrounds are
distracting. A plain background is preferred.
I note that you will not accept or act on that advice.
Consider also that if people try to
print your photos - a lot of ink toner will be used (and wasted) because of the background.
He always neglects my counter requests and pays no responds.
?
A strange comment.
You are retaliating instead of accepting my criticism graciously.
I am not going to invest hours of my personal time - and it would take days/weeks to sift through all of your documents.
That's time I will never get back - and I am too busy with my own projects.
I am not obligated to you - and my time is my own.
For his comment above, some are quite challenging
Its simply criticism of your paper.
You are publishing to the world - and so you should expect to receive technical criticism.
I think you have difficulty accepting criticism.
I urge you to read this article:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/evolution-the-self/200901/why-criticism-is-so-hard-take-part-1 Here is a paradigm for you yChan:
Try typing: "Thanks Mark - I can see your point of view. I will take your points into consideration. I am always trying to improve my published work".
Instead of
retaliating.
...
Repeat of key criticisms:1. Your work is presented in a way that is deeply convoluted - relationships between knots and how they work is obfuscated.
2. There is no index/contents and/or page numbering to relate to - which makes it hard to cross reference your content.
3. Your photos are
terrible - you may dislike the word 'terrible' - and feel offended. That's something you need to work on
4. There are numerous errors throughout your work - I've pointed some of them out to you - its up to you to act on that information.
5. There is no way to extract
meaning from your content - for example, what insights or conclusions can the public draw from your work?
And closing comment:I do appreciate your efforts yChan - I think you missed that key point of my narrative.
I imagine that you have invested many hours of your time to produce this work.
Its just a shame that it is presented in a way that locks out most people - and it is hard for the layperson to extract any useful meaning.
Even for a knot geek - it is challenging to sift through your work and try to extract meaning.