I have been in this guy s position !
Look at the picture of my test rig, at Reply#1. To fasten the binder there, where there is not much room in between the door, at the left, the wall, in front, and the central heating s radiator, at the right, I had to crawl myself in a "uncomfortable" position, indeed !
However, I could chose to pull either the returning eye leg coming from below, towards the floor, or the returning eye leg coming from above, towards the ceiling, and this was an option that I would nt have, had I tied a "common" binder in the same place. I would had been forced to pull the one, only, end, towards one, only, direction, and this would had been more difficult for me. The fact that one can choose what is more convenient to him, to pull the one end towards the one direction or the other towards the other direction, is an advantage of this type of binders the "common" binders ( as the first one you show at the left side of your sketch ) miss.
Anyway, I think I understood what you mean - in some applications the
handcuff-type, two-loops binder would not be suitable, indeed - but in some others it offers the advantages I had described in my previous post, which the "common", one-loop binders do not.
However, the issue is not which binder, as a tool, is more versatile, in general, but if
this knot, in particular, is a good tool, if we wish to tie this type of binder !
Is it comparable to the single-wrap
Gleipnir based on a Clove hitch, or an overhand knot (1), for example ?
1.
http://igkt.net/sm/index.php?topic=4818.0