If, in the single of double Fisherman s knot, ...
Which is to say Let us employ <this knot> in a pull-together end-2-end knot --many things work by the general mechanism.
I have used the terminology of Miles ( p.73-74 ), who mentions that, of the 60 bends he shows, this "
Sliding halves" mechanism is present at 7 -
and he makes the distinction between the two ways ( SH2 / SH4 ) the ends each one of those two halves can penetrate the nub of the other.
pull-together ? ? Naah !
Pull-against, perhaps ?
No, if you keep to the symmetry of your seed --same-handedness in the components, mind !
I have tied the "other" bend, and I have not been satisfied neither with its tightness ( it is not as compact ), nor with its looks - and I always prefer a bend, if flattish, to be
side-symmetric ( as the Zeppelin bend, for example ): it needs one only picture !
Moreover, the Fisherman s knot itself can be tied the "other" way, and I do not believe that, when tied on ordinary materials, its security or strength is much jeopardised.
...which ends are better loaded...
Waiting for a pop-up to resurface, I had planted a small trap : I have already mentioned which I consider as the "normal" and which the "reversed" form, in this "
second" adjective I have used for the tail leg of the collar.
Also, with this loading, the whole nub of the knot lies in between the two first curves, so it is submitted to pressure along it full length, while the individual parts are submitted to tension : a good thing, regarding the nipping power of the various elements on the Tail ends, i.e., regarding security. And a more compact knot is always a
prettier knot...