what is lost, still, is the neat sort
of opposed-bights nipping that gives the Ossel such
staying-tied security.
I'm a newbie, so please correct me if I'm wrong here. My intent is to contribute ideas, not ego.
I played with this, and I really don't think much is lost with the round turn in the proposed hitch.
...
The bight formed by the tail just before it exits doesn't seem to nip much at all, to me.
Bingo! --in that the loss comes mostly from any
relatively larger-diameter object rather than from
the different structure (the added turn). But look
at the basic
ossel hitch tied around a small-dia.
object, and you'll see how that turn around the SPart
is opposed by the "L" turn&tuck of the tail --that's
what I'm pointing to. And, so, I have played around
with making the "L" sharper ("U"), and so on, and
to get the nipping effected independent of hitched
object!
Now, sparing another camera-click and special offload/upload,
at the moment,
I think words will suffice to my suggestion of effecting an
object-indepent
opposed-bights nipping structure above.
We'll work on a horizontally disposed object/cylinder,
from left to right.
With the tail, form a small eye, in a
timber hitch manner,
turning the tail back over then tucked back under itself
(first crossing being *over* ensures the the nipped crossing
falls back more surely against the object!); this small eye
resided above (visually to our horizontal cylinder) & against
the cyclinder, dogged tail extending rightwards at the back.
Now, line flowing Top-Back-Down-Front-Up-..., as we've begun,
make a wrap (moving rightwards) around the cylinder and
cross over (further trapping/nipping) the tail; maybe "one good
turn deserves another? (YMMV on needed *grip* vs. lateral load);
and now on subsequent wrap,
as we bring SPart
(ah, yes, I assume a relatively short hitching line, and am tying
the knot *backwards*, so to speak --end->outwards! (which
shows a problem with the term "working end", as I'm working
with the SPart-to-be, in another sense --of what has 100% load))
...
around from back, up ... now INTO our small eye,
and U-turn back (forming, thus, our opposing bight to the eye's)
and wrap Down-Back-Up...
with a little reach RIGHTwards, making subsequent wraps (just
1 or 2) from
right-to-left --we're aiming to bring the working
end (SPart) out through/between the opposed-bights.
These right-to-left wraps will be ones with greatest, SPart-delivered
tension, so it's worth having a couple, if grip is needed (i.e., I think
these will pay greater gripping dividends than those put in from
the small eye; some bit of *working* can help, but naturally the
load will feed these last-formed wraps).
...
and, as indicated, wrap back leftwards as desired and bring the
SPart-end out between the opposed bights (which itself implies
that one cannot tie the knot with much tension, as one must
have looseness in order to make this exit tuck).
Now, one can try building tension (pre-stretching the rather
frictive elastic tubing) by working the left half (here) of small
eye & follow-on wraps tight, hauling out that turn through
the eye (SPart now in place) to tension wraps, then pulling
back sharply to pull into small eye; then it's a matter of
working the right half's wraps tight, with final pull on the
SPart, which should be well nipped, now.
IN SOME USUAL CORDAGE (not surgical tubing, which I suspect
is frictive, and of course highly elastic), less "working" will be
needed, and more will occur naturally via loading.
Btw, for a fun time of exploration, which might lead to some
workable solution, as well, try loading the
ossel hitchin reverse --pull the tail! You'll see the new-tail
get nipped against the loaded end (new SPart); you might
endeavor to secure the tail in a way that fully forms an
opposing bight to this; add wraps at appropriate points
if lateral grip needs bolstering.
--dl*
====