Hi Phil,
I hope that you are having a good Christmas. One of the dogs got me up early needing a pee, so as the rest of the house slumbers in post prandial torpor I thought I might check to see if any other addicts have checked in - you seem to be the only one.
I do not recognise the 'knot', other than perhaps it is a slipped chain used to tidy up slack, finished with a couple of turns and a tuck. It is hard to determine anything else, especially in laid rope and without sight of an end.
Not much of a guess, but the challenge does highlight the issue which we as knotters still have to address - 'When is a knot not a knot ? ' and the fact that our language of knots is in disarray, being nothing more than a hotchpotch of terms aggregated from many trades, many nations and many 'generations'.
One of the major achievements of the various Trades Guilds has been to standardise and unify the terminology within those trades, and to create a framework within which development could flourish and innovations, improvements and understanding could be disseminated throughout and even between those respective Guilds. This is perhaps one of the most important contributions a Guild can bring to its field of expertise. In this important aspect, we are failing to live up to the grandiose title of GUILD that we have given ourselves. Perhaps this is at the heart of why so many are disappointed when they look into the Guild and find nothing more than an
International Hobby Group of Knot Tyers, for in truth, that is what we are.
Perhaps we should consider changing the name to prevent confusion and future disappointment...
Or perhaps we might consider tackling some of the tasks that fall to a true Guild and start living up to our chosen name ?
The IGKT came late into the game. In fact, by the time the IGKT was formed, the power of the Guilds was long gone and there was little chance of collecting the wealth needed to fund an active Guild heart. Any Guild like activity today will have to be achieved through the voluntary donation of effort from Guild members. However, set against this is the fact that we truly are International and today we have the power of the Internet through which we have the opportunity of becoming a very modern Guild.
As a modern Guild, there are many things we can achieve for our field - if only we set out our stall to identify these goals and create the groups within which volunteers can work and contribute -
- Standardise Terminology
- Standardise knot Names
- Recognise Skill levels through Accreditation
- Develop Training Programmes
- Promote R&D and University Projects
- Publish Papers in the field for peer review
- Honour exceptional skills and works
- ...
Today the Guild is struggling to find a Merchandising Secretary - we should ask why ? Perhaps it is because Guild members don't need a Guild shop ?
Perhaps the measure of what is wanted will be gauged by the level of volunteer effort ? Perhaps the best role of the Council would be to facilitate and promote the opportunities for participation, then sit back and see where the interest flows.
Anyway, having badly hijacked this thread, back to the point -
We really really need to resolve our terminology - what is a knot - what is a combination of knots to be called - what is not a knot etc. etc.
Perhaps for 2010 we should start a new Board -
Knot Terminology Standardisation. - to identify, define and resolve knot terminology, to achieve a unified standard to be adopted and promoted by the Guild.
Any takers ? ?
Derek