International Guild of Knot Tyers Forum

General => Chit Chat => Topic started by: knot4u on June 05, 2010, 06:07:00 AM

Title: Knot in Logo
Post by: knot4u on June 05, 2010, 06:07:00 AM
The answer is probably somewhere on this site, but I can't find it.

What kind of knot is that in the logo to this site?
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: phiz on June 05, 2010, 02:50:00 PM
Hi knot4u
The 'knot' used as the IGKT logo has no beginning or end and is only a representation. Its similar to an Ocean-Plait Mat based upon simple overhand knots. Its reminiscent of a Carrick Bend followed through.
Hope this helps. phiz
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: knot4u on June 05, 2010, 06:02:38 PM
OK, I see the Carrick Bend in it, thanks.

I have a hard time looking at representations and seeing the knot.  For example, I didn't see that the trefoil knot is a representation of the overhand knot until I was told so.
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: Dan_Lehman on June 05, 2010, 07:18:34 PM
The answer is probably somewhere on this site, but I can't find it.

What kind of knot is that in the logo to this site?


I've a political answer:  the wrong knot!

The IGKT's logo should be a SmitHunter's Bend -- i.e., the knot
that joined knotters from the 4 compass points of the world
(the knot's standing parts & ends nicely able to be oriented E-W-N-S).
Ropes should appropriately be laid & braided, signifying old & new,
historical & future knotting.

--dl*
====
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: knot4u on June 05, 2010, 07:37:04 PM
The answer is probably somewhere on this site, but I can't find it.

What kind of knot is that in the logo to this site?


I've a political answer:  the wrong knot!

The IGKT's logo should be a SmitHunter's Bend -- i.e., the knot
that joined knotters from the 4 compass points of the world
(the knot's standing parts & ends nicely able to be oriented E-W-N-S).
Ropes should appropriately be laid & braided, signifying old & new,
historical & future knotting.

--dl*
====

OK, a picture says a thousand words.  Please post a pic or a link.
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: Fairlead on June 05, 2010, 09:23:47 PM
The Guild Logo is a Flat Turk's Head - chosen because is is both practical and decorative

Faurlead
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: PatDucey on June 07, 2010, 05:20:56 AM
I have always looked at the logo as a 3 Lead x 4 Bight Turks Head doubled, and laid flat.  This knot can be tied as a Carrick Bend with the ends followed through.  Mechanically identical, it is the method of tying the knot that differntiates it between a Turks Head or Carrick Bend.  Seeing as the logo is a graphic representaton of a knot and was not actually tied, perhaps we shouls ask the person or persons who selected it as the logo and ask them what they where trying to represent.

Pat
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: Fairlead on June 07, 2010, 06:56:44 AM
Pat,  You need to talk to Liz Pawson then - as it was she who came up with the idea of a flat TH representing both practical and decorative knotting.

Fairlead
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: oldpete on June 07, 2010, 08:53:39 AM
as it was she who came up with the idea of a flat TH representing both practical and decorative knotting...... do you answer the question by accident. 
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: Fairlead on June 07, 2010, 10:42:59 PM
No Oldpete - from 'MUCH ADO ABOUT KNOTTING'  A history of the International Guild of Knot Tyers - The First Ten Years by Geoffrey Budworth.
 Quote
Liz Pawson's Turk's Head logo was, however a sensible element; and it was kept in the splendid later design (KM19 - April 1987) by Stuart Grainger.  The knot was comparatively simple, but a sign of the Guild's commitment to both practical and decorative knotting. 
 Ends
Is that good enough for you to believe?

Fairlead
Title: Re: Knot in Logo
Post by: oldpete on June 08, 2010, 01:09:55 AM
What I was saying was you said Liz came up with the turks head, which it clearly is, a flat turks head it just also happens to be the form of the 'Carrick Mat'  So it could be either, but if Liz designed as a flat turks head then the answer to the original question is found.